HTML has links - PDF has Authentication
388-14A-3960  <<  388-14A-3965 >>   388-14A-3970

PDFWAC 388-14A-3965

What happens at a hearing on a notice of abatement?

(1) The custodial parent (CP) has the burden of proof to demonstrate to the administrative law judge (ALJ) that the NCP has access to or possession of income or assets to pay child support while incarcerated.
(2) Any party to the hearing may show good cause why the abatement should end and support reinstate at a date other than what is specified in WAC 388-14A-3945.
(3) The ALJ must allow DCS to orally amend the notice of abatement at the hearing to conform to the evidence. The ALJ may grant a continuance, if necessary, to allow the parties additional time to present evidence or argument in response to the amendment.
(4) The administrative law judge issues an order:
(a) Upholding the notice of abatement;
(b) Upholding the notice of abatement and, upon a finding of good cause, specifying the date abatement ends; or
(c) Dismissing the notice of abatement because the objecting party met the burden of proof to show that NCP has access to or possession of income or assets to pay child support while incarcerated.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 26.09.916, 74.08.090, 74.20A.055. WSR 22-02-063, § 388-14A-3965, filed 1/4/22, effective 2/4/22.]