This chapter describes the general rules and procedures that apply to the health care authority's brief adjudicative proceedings and formal administrative hearings for the school employees benefits board program.

The following definitions apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly indicates another meaning:

"Accidental death and dismemberment insurance" or "AD&D" means basic accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance paid for by the SEBB organization, as well as supplemental accidental death and dismemberment insurance offered to and paid for by school employees for themselves and their dependents.

"Appellant" means a person who requests a brief adjudicative proceeding with the SEBB appeals unit about the action of the SEBB organization, the HCA, or its contracted vendor.

"Authority" or "HCA" means the Washington state health care authority.

"Board" means the school employees benefits board established under provisions of RCW 41.05.740.

"Brief adjudicative proceeding" means the process described in RCW 34.05.482 through 34.05.494 and in WAC 182-32-2000 through 182-32-2160.

"Business days" means all days except Saturdays, Sundays, and all state legal holidays as set forth in RCW 1.16.050.

"Calendar days" or "days" means all days including Saturdays, Sundays, and all state legal holidays as set forth in RCW 1.16.050.

"Continuance" means a change in the date or time of when a brief adjudicative proceeding or formal administrative hearing will occur.

"Contracted vendor" means any person, persons, or entity under contract or agreement with the HCA to provide goods or services for the provision or administration of SEBB benefits. The term "contracted vendor" includes subcontractors of the HCA and subcontractors of any person, persons, or entity under contract or agreement with the HCA that provide goods or services for the provision or administration of SEBB benefits.

"Denial" or "denial notice" means an action by, or communication from, a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization, contracted vendor, or the SEBB program that aggrieves a subscriber, a dependent, or an applicant, with regard to SEBB benefits including, but not limited to, actions or communications expressly designated as a "denial," "denial notice," or "cancellation notice."

"Dependent" means a person who meets eligibility requirements in WAC 182-31-140.

"Dependent care assistance program" or "DCAP" means a benefit plan whereby school employees may pay for certain employment related dependent care with pretax dollars as provided in the salary reduction plan under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 129 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Director" means the director of the authority.

"Dispositive motion" is a motion made to a presiding officer, reviewing officer, or hearing officer to decide a claim or case in favor of the moving party without further proceedings.

"Documents" means papers, letters, writings, electronic mail, electronic files, or other printed or written items.

"Employer-based group medical" means group medical related to a current employment relationship. It does not include medical coverage available to retired employees, individual market medical coverage or government-sponsored programs such as medicare or medicaid.

"Enrollee" means a person who meets all eligibility requirements defined in chapter 182-31 WAC or WAC 182-30-130, who is enrolled in SEBB benefits, and for whom applicable premium payments have been made.

"File" or "filing" means the act of delivering documents to the office of the presiding officer, reviewing officer, or hearing officer. A document is considered filed when it is received by the authority or its designee. A document may be filed by one or more of the following:

• Personal delivery to the authority at Cherry Street Plaza, 626 8th Avenue S.E., Olympia, Washington 98501;

• First class, registered, or certified mail to the authority to the following mailing address:

Health Care Authority

Attn: SEBB Appeals Unit

P.O. Box 45504

Olympia, WA 98504-5504;

• Fax: 360-763-4709; or

• Submission online through the designated submission portal.

The identified methods are the exclusive methods for a document to be filed, and submission of documents by any other fashion to the authority shall not constitute filing unless agreed to in advance by the authority.

"Final order" means an order that is the final health care authority decision.

"Formal administrative hearing" means a proceeding before a hearing officer that gives an appellant an opportunity for an evidentiary hearing as described in RCW 34.05.413 through 34.05.476 and WAC 182-32-3000 through 182-32-3200.

"HCA hearing representative" means a person who is authorized to represent the SEBB program in a formal administrative hearing. The person may be an assistant attorney general or authorized HCA employee.

"Health plan" means a plan offering medical, vision, dental, or any combination of these coverages, developed by the board and provided by a contracted vendor or self-insured plans administered by the HCA.

"Hearing officer" means an impartial decision maker who presides at a formal administrative hearing, and is:

• A director-designated HCA employee; or

• When the director has designated the office of administrative hearings (OAH) as a hearing body, an administrative law judge employed by the OAH.

"Life insurance" means any basic life insurance paid for by the SEBB organization, as well as supplemental life insurance or supplemental dependent life insurance offered to and paid for by school employees for themselves and their dependents.

"Limited purpose flexible spending arrangement" or "limited purpose FSA" means a benefit plan whereby eligible school employees may reduce their salary before taxes to pay for dental and vision expenses not reimbursed by insurance as provided in the salary reduction plan established under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Long-term disability insurance" or "LTD insurance" means employer-paid long-term disability insurance and employee-paid long-term disability insurance offered by the SEBB program.

"Medical flexible spending arrangement" or "medical FSA" means a benefit plan whereby eligible school employees may reduce their salary before taxes to pay for medical expenses not reimbursed by insurance as provided in the salary reduction plan established under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"PEBB" means the public employees benefits board.

"Prehearing conference" means a proceeding scheduled and conducted by a hearing officer to address issues in preparation for a formal administrative hearing.

"Premium payment plan" means a benefit plan whereby school employees may pay their share of group health plan premiums with pretax dollars as provided in the salary reduction plan under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Premium surcharge" means a payment required from a subscriber, in addition to the subscriber's medical premium contribution, due to an enrollee's tobacco use or an enrolled subscriber's spouse or state registered domestic partner choosing not to enroll in their employer-based group medical when:

• The spouse's or state registered domestic partner's share of the medical premiums is less than 95 percent of the additional cost an employee would be required to pay to enroll a spouse or state registered domestic partner in the public employees benefits board (PEBB) Uniform Medical Plan (UMP) Classic; and

• The benefits have an actuarial value of at least 95 percent of the actuarial value of PEBB UMP Classic benefits.

"Presiding officer" means an impartial decision maker who conducts a brief adjudicative proceeding and is a director-designated HCA employee.

"Reviewing officer or officers" means one or more delegates from the director that consider appeals relating to the administration of SEBB benefits by the SEBB program.

"Salary reduction plan" means a benefit plan whereby school employees may agree to a reduction of salary on a pretax basis to participate in the dependent care assistance program, medical flexible spending arrangement, limited purpose flexible spending arrangement, or premium payment plan offered pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"School employee" means:

• All employees of school districts and charter schools established under chapter 28A.710 RCW;

• Represented employees of educational service districts; and

• Effective January 1, 2024, all employees of educational service districts.

"School employees benefits board organization" or "SEBB organization" means a public school district or educational service district or charter school established under chapter 28A.710 RCW that is required to participate in benefit plans provided by the school employees benefit board.

"SEBB" means the school employees benefits board.

"SEBB benefits" means one or more insurance coverages or other employee benefits administered by the SEBB program within the HCA.

"SEBB insurance coverage" means any health plan, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, or long-term disability insurance administered as a SEBB benefit.

"SEBB program" means the program within the HCA that administers insurance and other benefits for eligible school employees (as described in WAC 182-31-040 or 182-30-130), and eligible dependents (as described in WAC 182-31-140).

"State registered domestic partner," has the same meaning as defined in RCW 26.60.020(1) and substantially equivalent legal unions from other jurisdictions as defined in RCW 26.60.090.

"Subscriber" means the school employee or continuation coverage enrollee who has been determined eligible by the SEBB program or SEBB organizations, is enrolled in SEBB benefits, and is the individual to whom the SEBB program and contracted vendors will issue all notices, information, requests, and premium bills on behalf of an enrollee.

"Tobacco products" means any product made with or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product. This includes, but is not limited to, cigars, cigarettes, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, snuff, and other tobacco products. It does not include e-cigarettes or United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved quit aids.

"Tobacco use" means any use of tobacco products within the past two months. Tobacco use, however, does not include the religious or ceremonial use of tobacco.

The following definitions apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly indicates another meaning:

"Accidental death and dismemberment insurance" or "AD&D" means basic accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance paid for by the SEBB organization, as well as supplemental accidental death and dismemberment insurance offered to and paid for by school employees for themselves and their dependents.

"Appellant" means a person who requests a brief adjudicative proceeding with the SEBB appeals unit about the action of the SEBB organization, employer group, the HCA, or its contracted vendor.

"Authority" or "HCA" means the Washington state health care authority.

"Board" means the school employees benefits board established under provisions of RCW 41.05.740.

"Brief adjudicative proceeding" means the process described in RCW 34.05.482 through 34.05.494 and in WAC 182-32-2000 through 182-32-2160.

"Business days" means all days except Saturdays, Sundays, and all state legal holidays as set forth in RCW 1.16.050.

"Calendar days" or "days" means all days including Saturdays, Sundays, and all state legal holidays as set forth in RCW 1.16.050.

"Continuance" means a change in the date or time of when a brief adjudicative proceeding or formal administrative hearing will occur.

"Contracted vendor" means any person, persons, or entity under contract or agreement with the HCA to provide goods or services for the provision or administration of SEBB benefits. The term "contracted vendor" includes subcontractors of the HCA and subcontractors of any person, persons, or entity under contract or agreement with the HCA that provide goods or services for the provision or administration of SEBB benefits.

"Denial" or "denial notice" means an action by, or communication from, a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization, employer group, contracted vendor, or the SEBB program that aggrieves a subscriber, a dependent, or an applicant, with regard to SEBB benefits including, but not limited to, actions or communications expressly designated as a "denial," "denial notice," or "cancellation notice."

"Dependent" means a person who meets eligibility requirements in WAC 182-31-140.

"Dependent care assistance program" or "DCAP" means a benefit plan whereby school employees may pay for certain employment related dependent care with pretax dollars as provided in the salary reduction plan under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 129 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Director" means the director of the authority.

"Dispositive motion" is a motion made to a presiding officer, reviewing officer, or hearing officer to decide a claim or case in favor of the moving party without further proceedings.

"Documents" means papers, letters, writings, electronic mail, electronic files, or other printed or written items.

"Employer-based group medical" means group medical related to a current employment relationship. It does not include medical coverage available to retired employees, individual market medical coverage or government-sponsored programs such as medicare or medicaid.

"Employer group" means an employee organization representing school employees and a tribal school as defined in RCW 28A.715.010, obtaining school employee benefits through a contractual agreement with the authority to participate in benefit plans developed by the school employees benefits board as described in WAC 182-30-215.

"Enrollee" means a person who meets all eligibility requirements defined in chapter 182-31 WAC or WAC 182-30-130, who is enrolled in SEBB benefits, and for whom applicable premium payments have been made.

"File" or "filing" means the act of delivering documents to the office of the presiding officer, reviewing officer, or hearing officer. A document is considered filed when it is received by the authority or its designee. A document may be filed by one or more of the following:

• Personal delivery to the authority at Cherry Street Plaza, 626 8th Avenue S.E., Olympia, Washington 98501;

• First class, registered, or certified mail to the authority to the following mailing address:

Health Care Authority

Attn: SEBB Appeals Unit

P.O. Box 45504

Olympia, WA 98504-5504;

• Fax: 360-763-4709; or

• Submission online through the designated submission portal.

The identified methods are the exclusive methods for a document to be filed, and submission of documents by any other fashion to the authority shall not constitute filing unless agreed to in advance by the authority.

"Final order" means an order that is the final health care authority decision.

"Flexible spending arrangement" or "FSA" means a benefit plan whereby eligible school employees may reduce their salary before taxes to pay for medical expenses not reimbursed by insurance as provided in the salary reduction plan established under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Formal administrative hearing" means a proceeding before a hearing officer that gives an appellant an opportunity for an evidentiary hearing as described in RCW 34.05.413 through 34.05.476 and WAC 182-32-3000 through 182-32-3200.

"HCA hearing representative" means a person who is authorized to represent the SEBB program in a formal administrative hearing. The person may be an assistant attorney general or authorized HCA employee.

"Health plan" means a plan offering medical, vision, dental, or any combination of these coverages, developed by the board and provided by a contracted vendor or self-insured plans administered by the HCA.

"Hearing officer" means an impartial decision maker who presides at a formal administrative hearing, and is:

• A director-designated HCA employee; or

• When the director has designated the office of administrative hearings (OAH) as a hearing body, an administrative law judge employed by the OAH.

"Life insurance" means any basic life insurance paid for by the SEBB organization, as well as supplemental life insurance or supplemental dependent life insurance offered to and paid for by school employees for themselves and their dependents.

"Limited purpose flexible spending arrangement" or "limited purpose FSA" means a benefit plan whereby eligible school employees may reduce their salary before taxes to pay for dental and vision expenses not reimbursed by insurance as provided in the salary reduction plan established under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Long-term disability insurance" or "LTD insurance" means employer-paid long-term disability insurance and employee-paid long-term disability insurance offered by the SEBB program.

"PEBB" means the public employees benefits board.

"Prehearing conference" means a proceeding scheduled and conducted by a hearing officer to address issues in preparation for a formal administrative hearing.

"Premium payment plan" means a benefit plan whereby school employees may pay their share of group health plan premiums with pretax dollars as provided in the salary reduction plan under chapter 41.05 RCW pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"Premium surcharge" means a payment required from a subscriber, in addition to the subscriber's medical premium contribution, due to an enrollee's tobacco use or an enrolled subscriber's spouse or state registered domestic partner choosing not to enroll in their employer-based group medical when:

• The spouse's or state registered domestic partner's share of the medical premiums is less than 95 percent of the additional cost an employee would be required to pay to enroll a spouse or state registered domestic partner in the public employees benefits board (PEBB) Uniform Medical Plan (UMP) Classic; and

• The benefits have an actuarial value of at least 95 percent of the actuarial value of PEBB UMP Classic benefits.

"Presiding officer" means an impartial decision maker who conducts a brief adjudicative proceeding and is a director-designated HCA employee.

"Reviewing officer or officers" means one or more delegates from the director that consider appeals relating to the administration of SEBB benefits by the SEBB program.

"Salary reduction plan" means a benefit plan whereby school employees may agree to a reduction of salary on a pretax basis to participate in the dependent care assistance program, flexible spending arrangement, limited purpose flexible spending arrangement, or premium payment plan offered pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sec. 125 or other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.

"School board member" means the board of directors of a school district as governed by chapter 28A.343 RCW or the board of directors of an educational service district as governed by chapter 28A.310 RCW.

"School employee" means all employees of school districts and charter schools established under chapter 28A.710 RCW; represented employees of educational service districts; effective January 1, 2024, all employees of educational service districts; and effective January 1, 2024, pursuant to a contractual agreement with the authority, "school employee" may also include (a) employees of employee organizations representing school employees, at the option of each such employee organization; and (b) employees of a tribal school as defined in RCW 28A.715.010, if the governing body of the tribal school seeks and receives the approval of the authority to provide any of its insurance programs by contracts with the authority, as provided in RCW 41.05.021 (1)(f) and (g).

"School employees benefits board organization" or "SEBB organization" means a public school district or educational service district or charter school established under chapter 28A.710 RCW that is required to participate in benefit plans provided by the school employees benefit board.

"SEBB" means the school employees benefits board.

"SEBB benefits" means one or more insurance coverages or other employee benefits administered by the SEBB program within the HCA.

"SEBB insurance coverage" means any health plan, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, or long-term disability insurance administered as a SEBB benefit.

"SEBB program" means the program within the HCA that administers insurance and other benefits for eligible school employees (as described in WAC 182-31-040 or 182-30-130), eligible dependents (as described in WAC 182-31-140), and eligible school board members (as described in WAC 182-31-200).

"State registered domestic partner," has the same meaning as defined in RCW 26.60.020(1) and substantially equivalent legal unions from other jurisdictions as defined in RCW 26.60.090.

"Subscriber" means the school employee, continuation coverage enrollee, or school board member who has been determined eligible by the SEBB program, SEBB organization, or employer group, is enrolled in SEBB benefits, and is the individual to whom the SEBB program and contracted vendors will issue all notices, information, requests, and premium bills on behalf of an enrollee.

"Tobacco products" means any product made with or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product. This includes, but is not limited to, cigars, cigarettes, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, snuff, and other tobacco products. It does not include e-cigarettes or United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved quit aids.

"Tobacco use" means any use of tobacco products within the past two months. Tobacco use, however, does not include the religious or ceremonial use of tobacco.

"Tribal school" has the same meaning as defined in RCW 28A.715.010.

(1) During the appeal process, if the appellant's mailing address changes, the appellant must notify the school employees benefits board (SEBB) appeals unit as soon as possible.

(2) If the appellant does not notify the SEBB appeals unit of a change in the appellant's mailing address and the SEBB appeals unit continues to serve notices and other important documents to the appellant's last known mailing address, the documents will be deemed served on the appellant.

(3) This requirement to provide notice of an address change is in addition to WAC 182-30-075 that require a subscriber to update their address with the SEBB appeals unit.

(1) When the rules in this chapter or in other school employees benefits board (SEBB) program rules or statutes require a party to serve copies of documents on other parties, a party must send copies of the documents to all other parties or their representatives as described in this chapter. In this section, requirements for service or delivery by a party apply also when service is required by the presiding officer or reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer.

(2) Unless otherwise stated in applicable law, documents may be sent only as identified in this chapter to accomplish service. A party may serve someone by:

(a) Personal service (hand delivery);

(b) First class, registered, or certified mail sent via the United States Postal Service or Washington state consolidated mail services;

(c) Fax;

(d) Commercial delivery service; or

(e) Legal messenger service.

(3) A party must serve all other parties or their representatives whenever the party files a motion, pleading, brief, or other document with the presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer's office, or when required by law.

(4) Unless otherwise stated in applicable law, service is complete when:

(a) Personal service is made;

(b) Mail is properly stamped, addressed, and deposited in the United States Postal Service;

(c) Mail is properly addressed, and deposited in the Washington state consolidated mail services;

(d) Fax produces proof of transmission;

(e) A parcel is delivered to a commercial delivery service with charges prepaid; or

(f) A parcel is delivered to a legal messenger service with charges prepaid.

(5) A party may prove service by providing any of the following:

(a) A signed affidavit of mailing or certificate of service;

(b) The certified mail receipt signed by the person who received the parcel;

(c) A signed receipt from the person who accepted the commercial delivery service or legal messenger service parcel;

(d) Proof of fax transmission.

(6) Service cannot be made by electronic mail unless mutually agreed to in advance and in writing by the parties.

(7) If the document is a subpoena, follow the compliance procedure as described in WAC 182-32-3130.

(1) A school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization must apply SEBB program rules adopted in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) and follow instructions from the authority.

(2) A presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer must first apply the applicable SEBB program rules adopted in the WAC. If no SEBB program rule applies, the presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer must decide the issue according to the best legal authority and reasoning available, including federal and Washington state constitutions, statutes, regulations, significant decisions indexed as described in WAC 182-32-130, and court decisions.

(1) A school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or employer group must apply SEBB program rules adopted in the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) and follow instructions from the authority.

(2) A presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer must first apply the applicable SEBB program rules adopted in the WAC. If no SEBB program rule applies, the presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer must decide the issue according to the best legal authority and reasoning available, including federal and Washington state constitutions, statutes, regulations, significant decisions indexed as described in WAC 182-32-130, and court decisions.

(1) The burden of proof is a party's responsibility to provide evidence regarding disputed facts and persuade the presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers, or hearing officer that a position is correct based on the standard of proof. Unless stated otherwise in rules or law, the appellant has the burden of proof in a brief adjudicative proceeding or formal administrative hearing.

(2) Standard of proof refers to the amount of evidence needed to prove a party's position. Unless stated otherwise in rules or law, the standard of proof in a brief adjudicative proceeding or formal administrative hearing is a preponderance of the evidence, meaning that something is more likely to be true than not.

(3) Public officers and school employees benefits board (SEBB) organizations are presumed to have properly performed their duties and acted as described in the law, unless preponderance of the evidence to the contrary is presented. A party challenging this presumption bears the burden of proof.

(1) In computing any period of time prescribed by this chapter, the day of the event from which the time begins to run is not included. (For example, if an initial order is served on Friday and the party has twenty-one days to request a review, start counting the days with Saturday.)

(2) As provided in subsection (3) of this section, the last day of the period so computed is included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday as defined in RCW 1.16.050, in which case the period extends to the next business day.

(3) When the period of time prescribed or allowed is ten days or less, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and state legal holidays must be excluded in the computation.

(4) The deadline is 5:00 p.m. on the last day of the computed period.

(1) A final order may be relied upon, used, or cited as precedent by a party only if the final order has been indexed in the authority's index of significant decisions in accordance with RCW 34.05.473 (1)(b).

(2) An index of significant decisions is available to the public on the health care authority's (HCA) website. As decisions are indexed they will be available on the website.

(3) A final order published in the index of significant decisions may be removed from the index when:

(a) A published decision entered by the court of appeals or the supreme court reverses an indexed final order; or

(b) HCA determines that the indexed final order is no longer precedential due to changes in statute, rule, or policy.

Pursuant to RCW 34.05.482, the authority may use brief adjudicative proceedings for issues identified in this chapter when doing so would not violate law, or when protection of the public interest does not require the authority to give notice and an opportunity to participate to persons other than the parties, or the issue and interests involved in the controversy do not warrant use of the procedures of RCW 34.05.413 through 34.05.476 which govern formal administrative hearings.

The record in a brief adjudicative proceeding consists of any documents regarding the matter, considered or prepared by the presiding officer for the brief adjudicative proceeding or by the reviewing officer or officers for any review. The authority's record does not have to constitute the exclusive basis for agency action, unless otherwise required by law.

(1) Any current or former school employee of a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or their dependent aggrieved by a decision made by the SEBB organization with regard to SEBB eligibility, enrollment, or premium surcharges may appeal that decision to the SEBB organization by the process described in WAC 182-32-2020.

(2) Any subscriber or dependent aggrieved by a decision made by the SEBB program with regard to SEBB eligibility, enrollment, premium payments, premium surcharges, eligibility to participate in the SEBB wellness incentive program, or eligibility to receive the SEBB wellness incentive, may appeal that decision to the SEBB appeals unit by the process described in WAC 182-32-2030.

(3) Any enrollee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of SEBB medical, dental, and vision, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance, or long-term disability insurance, may appeal that decision by following the appeal provisions of those plans, with the exception of:

(a) Enrollment decisions;

(b) Premium payment decisions other than life insurance or AD&D insurance premium payment decisions; and

(c) Eligibility decisions.

(4) Any SEBB enrollee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of SEBB property and casualty insurance may appeal that decision by following the appeal provisions of those plans.

(5) Any school employee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of a benefit offered under the salary reduction plan may appeal that decision by the process described in WAC 182-32-2050.

(6) Any subscriber aggrieved by a decision made by the SEBB wellness incentive program contracted vendor regarding the completion of the SEBB wellness incentive program requirements, or a request for a reasonable alternative to a wellness incentive program requirement, may appeal that decision by the process described in WAC 182-32-2040.

(1) Any current or former school employee of a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or their dependent aggrieved by a decision made by the SEBB organization with regard to SEBB eligibility, enrollment, or premium surcharges may appeal that decision to the SEBB organization by the process described in WAC 182-32-2020.

(2) Any current or former school employee of an employer group or their dependent who is aggrieved by a decision made by the employer group with regard to SEBB eligibility, enrollment, or premium surcharges may appeal that decision to the employer group through the process established by the employer group.

(3) Any subscriber or dependent aggrieved by a decision made by the SEBB program with regard to SEBB eligibility, enrollment, premium payments, premium surcharges, eligibility to participate in the SEBB wellness incentive program, or eligibility to receive the SEBB wellness incentive, may appeal that decision to the SEBB appeals unit by the process described in WAC 182-32-2030.

(4) Any enrollee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of SEBB medical, dental, and vision, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance, or long-term disability insurance, may appeal that decision by following the appeal provisions of those plans, with the exception of:

(a) Enrollment decisions;

(b) Premium payment decisions other than life insurance or AD&D insurance premium payment decisions; and

(c) Eligibility decisions.

(5) Any SEBB enrollee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of SEBB property and casualty insurance may appeal that decision by following the appeal provisions of those plans.

(6) Any school employee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of a benefit offered under the salary reduction plan may appeal that decision by the process described in WAC 182-32-2050.

(7) Any subscriber aggrieved by a decision made by the SEBB wellness incentive program contracted vendor regarding the completion of the SEBB wellness incentive program requirements, or a request for a reasonable alternative to a wellness incentive program requirement, may appeal that decision by the process described in WAC 182-32-2040.

(1) An eligibility, premium surcharges, or enrollment decision made by a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization may be appealed by submitting a written request for administrative review to the SEBB organization. The SEBB organization must receive the request for administrative review no later than thirty days after the date of the denial notice. The contents of the request for administrative review are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(a) Upon receiving the request for administrative review, the SEBB organization must perform a complete review of the denial by one or more staff who did not take part in the decision resulting in the denial.

(b) The SEBB organization must render a written decision within thirty days of receiving the written request for administrative review. The written decision must be sent to the school employee or school employee's dependent who submitted the request for administrative review and must include a description of the appeal rights. The SEBB organization must also send a copy of the SEBB organization's written decision to the SEBB organization's administrator (or designee) and to the SEBB appeals unit. If the SEBB organization fails to render a written decision within thirty days of receiving the written request for administrative review, the request for administrative review may be considered denied as of the thirty-first day and the original underlying SEBB organization decision may be appealed to the SEBB appeals unit by following the process in this section.

(c) The SEBB organization may reverse eligibility, premium surcharges, or enrollment decisions as permitted by WAC 182-30-060.

(2) Any current or former school employee or school employee's dependent who disagrees with the SEBB organization's decision in response to a written request for administrative review, as described in subsection (1) of this section, may request a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit.

(a) The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than thirty days after the date of the SEBB organization's written decision on the request for administrative review. If the SEBB organization fails to render a written decision within thirty days of receiving a written request for administrative review, the SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than thirty days after the date the request for administrative review was deemed denied. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(ii) Once the SEBB appeals unit receives a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB appeals unit will send a request for documentation and information to the applicable SEBB organization. The SEBB organization will then have two business days to respond to the request and provide the requested documentation and information. The SEBB organization will also send a copy of the documentation and information to the appellant.

(iii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB organization's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(1) A decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) program regarding eligibility, enrollment, premium payments, premium surcharges, or a SEBB wellness incentive may be appealed by submitting a request to the SEBB appeals unit for a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority.

(2) The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(3) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a current or former school employee or school employee's dependent must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than thirty days after the date of the denial notice.

(4) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a self-pay enrollee or dependent of self-pay enrollee must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than sixty days after the date of the denial notice.

(5) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(6) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(7) Failing to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding will result in the prior SEBB program decision becoming the authority's final order without further action.

(1) A decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) program regarding eligibility, enrollment, premium payments, premium surcharges, or a SEBB wellness incentive may be appealed by submitting a request to the SEBB appeals unit for a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority.

(2) A decision made by an employer group regarding life insurance, LTD insurance, eligibility to participate in the SEBB wellness incentive program, or eligibility to receive a SEBB wellness incentive, may be appealed by submitting a request to the SEBB appeals unit for a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority.

(3) The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(4) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a current or former school employee or school employee's dependent must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than 30 days after the date of the denial notice.

(5) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a continuation coverage enrollee, school board member, or their dependent must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than 60 days after the date of the denial notice.

(6) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(7) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(8) Failing to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding will result in the prior SEBB program decision becoming the authority's final order without further action.

(1) Any subscriber aggrieved by a decision regarding the completion of the wellness incentive program requirements, or request for a reasonable alternative to a wellness incentive program requirement, may appeal that decision to the school employees benefits board (SEBB) wellness incentive program contracted vendor.

(2) Any subscriber who disagrees with a decision in response to an appeal filed with the SEBB wellness incentive program contracted vendor may appeal the decision by submitting a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding to the SEBB appeals unit.

(a) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a current or former school employee must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than thirty days after the date of the denial notice. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(b) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a self-pay subscriber must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than sixty days after the date of the denial notice. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(3) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(4) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(5) If a subscriber fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the decision of the SEBB wellness incentive program contracted vendor becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(1) Any subscriber aggrieved by a decision regarding the completion of the wellness incentive program requirements, or request for a reasonable alternative to a wellness incentive program requirement, may appeal that decision to the school employees benefits board (SEBB) wellness incentive program contracted vendor.

(2) Any subscriber who disagrees with a decision in response to an appeal filed with the SEBB wellness incentive program contracted vendor may appeal the decision by submitting a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding to the SEBB appeals unit.

(a) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a current or former school employee must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than 30 days after the date of the denial notice. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(b) The request for a brief adjudicative proceeding from a continuation coverage enrollee or school board member must be received by the SEBB appeals unit no later than 60 days after the date of the denial notice. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(3) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(4) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(5) If a subscriber fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the decision of the SEBB wellness incentive program contracted vendor becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(1) Any school employee who disagrees with a decision that denies eligibility for, or enrollment in, a benefit offered under the salary reduction plan may appeal that decision by submitting a written request for administrative review to their school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization. The SEBB organization must receive the written request for administrative review no later than 30 days after the date of the decision resulting in denial. The contents of the written request for administrative review are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(a) Upon receiving the written request for administrative review, the SEBB organization must perform a complete review of the denial by one or more staff who did not take part in the decision resulting in the denial.

(b) The SEBB organization must render a written decision within 30 days of receiving the written request for administrative review. The written decision must be sent to the school employee who submitted the written request for review and must include a description of appeal rights. The SEBB organization must also send a copy of the SEBB organization's written decision to the SEBB organization's administrator (or designee) and to the SEBB appeals unit. If the SEBB organization fails to render a written decision within 30 days of receiving the written request for administrative review, the request for administrative review may be considered denied as of the 31st day and the original underlying SEBB organization decision may be appealed to the SEBB appeals unit by following the process in this section.

(2) Any school employee who disagrees with the SEBB organization's decision in response to a written request for administrative review, as described in this section, may request a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit.

(a) The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the SEBB organization's written decision on the request for administrative review. If a SEBB organization fails to render a written decision within 30 days of receiving a written request for administrative review, the SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date the request for administrative review was deemed denied. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(ii) Once the SEBB appeals unit receives a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB appeals unit will send a request for documentation and information to the applicable SEBB organization. The SEBB organization will then have two business days to respond to the request and provide the documentation and information requested. The SEBB organization will also send a copy of the documentation and information to the school employee.

(iii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB organization's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(3) Any school employee aggrieved by a decision regarding a claim for benefits under the medical flexible spending arrangement or limited purpose flexible spending arrangement (FSA) or dependent care assistance program (DCAP) offered under the salary reduction plan may appeal that decision to the authority's contracted vendor by following the appeal process of that contracted vendor.

(a) Any school employee who disagrees with a decision in response to an appeal filed with the contracted vendor that administers the medical FSA, limited purpose FSA, and DCAP under the salary reduction plan may request a brief adjudicative proceeding by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit. The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the contracted vendor's appeal decision. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(ii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the contracted vendor's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(4) Any school employee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of the premium payment plan offered under the salary reduction plan may request a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit for a brief adjudicative proceeding.

(a) The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the denial notice by the SEBB program. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-16-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the notice of appeal has been received.

(ii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB program's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(1) Any school employee who disagrees with a decision that denies eligibility for, or enrollment in, a benefit offered under the salary reduction plan may appeal that decision by submitting a written request for administrative review to their school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization. The SEBB organization must receive the written request for administrative review no later than 30 days after the date of the decision resulting in denial. The contents of the written request for administrative review are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(a) Upon receiving the written request for administrative review, the SEBB organization must perform a complete review of the denial by one or more staff who did not take part in the decision resulting in the denial.

(b) The SEBB organization must render a written decision within 30 days of receiving the written request for administrative review. The written decision must be sent to the school employee who submitted the written request for review and must include a description of appeal rights. The SEBB organization must also send a copy of the SEBB organization's written decision to the SEBB organization's administrator (or designee) and to the SEBB appeals unit. If the SEBB organization fails to render a written decision within 30 days of receiving the written request for administrative review, the request for administrative review may be considered denied as of the 31st day and the original underlying SEBB organization decision may be appealed to the SEBB appeals unit by following the process in this section.

(2) Any school employee who disagrees with the SEBB organization's decision in response to a written request for administrative review, as described in this section, may request a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit.

(a) The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the SEBB organization's written decision on the request for administrative review. If a SEBB organization fails to render a written decision within 30 days of receiving a written request for administrative review, the SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date the request for administrative review was deemed denied. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(ii) Once the SEBB appeals unit receives a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB appeals unit will send a request for documentation and information to the applicable SEBB organization. The SEBB organization will then have two business days to respond to the request and provide the documentation and information requested. The SEBB organization will also send a copy of the documentation and information to the school employee.

(iii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB organization's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(3) Any school employee aggrieved by a decision regarding a claim for benefits under the flexible spending arrangement or limited purpose flexible spending arrangement (FSA) or dependent care assistance program (DCAP) offered under the salary reduction plan may appeal that decision to the authority's contracted vendor by following the appeal process of that contracted vendor.

(a) Any school employee who disagrees with a decision in response to an appeal filed with the contracted vendor that administers the FSA, limited purpose FSA, and DCAP under the salary reduction plan may request a brief adjudicative proceeding by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit. The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the contracted vendor's appeal decision. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(ii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the contracted vendor's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(4) Any school employee aggrieved by a decision regarding the administration of the premium payment plan offered under the salary reduction plan may request a brief adjudicative proceeding to be conducted by the authority by submitting a written request to the SEBB appeals unit for a brief adjudicative proceeding.

(a) The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the denial notice by the SEBB program. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-16-2070.

(i) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the notice of appeal has been received.

(ii) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(b) If a school employee fails to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding, the SEBB program's prior written decision becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(1) An entity or organization whose employer group application to participate in school employees benefits board (SEBB) insurance coverage is denied by the authority may appeal the decision by submitting a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding to the SEBB appeals unit.

(2) The SEBB appeals unit must receive the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding no later than 30 days after the date of the denial notice. The contents of the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding are to be provided as described in WAC 182-32-2070.

(3) The SEBB appeals unit must notify the appellant in writing when the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding has been received.

(4) The brief adjudicative proceeding will be conducted by a presiding officer designated by the director.

(5) Failing to timely request a brief adjudicative proceeding will result in the prior SEBB program decision becoming the authority's final order without further action.

A written request for administrative review of the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization's decision and a request for brief adjudicative proceeding should contain:

(1) The name and mailing address of the party requesting an administrative review or the brief adjudicative proceeding;

(2) The name and mailing address of the appealing party's representative, if any;

(3) Documentation, or reference to documentation, of decisions previously rendered through the appeal process, if any;

(4) A statement identifying the specific portion of the decision being appealed and clarifying what is believed to be unlawful or in error;

(5) A statement of facts in support of the appealing party's position;

(6) Any information or documentation that the appealing party would like considered;

(7) The type of relief sought; and

(8) The signature of the appealing party or the appealing party's representative.

A written request for administrative review of the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization's or employer group's decision and a request for brief adjudicative proceeding should contain:

(1) The name and mailing address of the party requesting an administrative review or the brief adjudicative proceeding;

(2) The name and mailing address of the appealing party's representative, if any;

(3) Documentation, or reference to documentation, of decisions previously rendered through the appeal process, if any;

(4) A statement identifying the specific portion of the decision being appealed and clarifying what is believed to be unlawful or in error;

(5) A statement of facts in support of the appealing party's position;

(6) Any information or documentation that the appealing party would like considered;

(7) The type of relief sought; and

(8) The signature of the appealing party or the appealing party's representative.

(1) The appellant may act as their own representative or may choose to be represented by another person, except that employees of the health care authority (HCA) or HCA's authorized agents may not represent an appellant, unless approved by a presiding officer or reviewing officer.

(2) If the appellant is represented by a person who is not an attorney admitted to practice in Washington state, the representative must provide the presiding officer and other parties with the representative's name, address, and telephone number. In cases involving confidential information, the nonattorney representative must provide the school employees benefits board (SEBB) appeals unit and other parties with a signed, written consent permitting release to the nonattorney representative of the appellant's health information protected by state or federal law.

(3) An attorney admitted to practice law in Washington state representing the appellant must file a written notice of appearance containing the attorney's name, address, and telephone number with the presiding officer's office and serve all parties with the notice. In cases involving confidential information, the attorney must provide the SEBB appeals unit and other parties with a signed, written consent permitting release to the attorney of the appellant's health information protected by state or federal law. If the appellant's attorney representative no longer represents the appellant, then the attorney must file a written notice of withdrawal of representation with the presiding officer or reviewing officer or officer's office and serve all parties with the notice.

The presiding officer, reviewing officer or officers may grant, in their sole discretion, a request for a continuance on motion of the appellant, the authority, or on their own. The continuance may be up to 30 calendar days.

Unless a continuance has been granted, within ten days after the school employees benefits board (SEBB) appeals unit receives a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding, the presiding officer must render a written initial order that addresses the issue or issues raised by the appellant in their appeal. The presiding officer must serve a copy of the initial order on all parties and the initial order must contain information on how the appellant may request review of the initial order.

(1) Both the appellant and the authority may request review of an initial order. An appellant who has received an initial order upholding a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization decision, SEBB program decision, or a decision made by a SEBB program contracted vendor, may request review of the initial order by the authority. The appellant may request review of the initial order by filing a written request or making an oral request with the SEBB appeals unit within 21 days after service of the initial order. The written or oral request for review of the initial order must be made by using the contact information included in the initial order. If the appellant fails to request review of the initial order within 21 days, the initial order becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(2) Upon timely request by the appellant, a review of an initial order will be performed by one or more reviewing officers designated by the director of the authority.

(3) If the appellant has not requested review, the authority may review an order resulting from a brief adjudicative proceeding on its own, and without notice to the parties, but it may not take action on review less favorable to any party than the initial order without giving that party notice and an opportunity to explain that party's view of the matter.

(1) Both the appellant and the authority may request review of an initial order. An appellant who has received an initial order upholding a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization decision, employer group decision, SEBB program decision, or a decision made by a SEBB program contracted vendor, may request review of the initial order by the authority. The appellant may request review of the initial order by filing a written request or making an oral request with the SEBB appeals unit within 21 days after service of the initial order. The written or oral request for review of the initial order must be made by using the contact information included in the initial order. If the appellant fails to request review of the initial order within 21 days, the initial order becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(2) Upon timely request by the appellant, a review of an initial order will be performed by one or more reviewing officers designated by the director of the authority.

(3) If the appellant has not requested review, the authority may review an order resulting from a brief adjudicative proceeding on its own, and without notice to the parties, but it may not take action on review less favorable to any party than the initial order without giving that party notice and an opportunity to explain that party's view of the matter.

(1) The appellant may withdraw the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding or review of an initial order for any reason, and at any time, by contacting the school employees benefits board (SEBB) appeals unit. The SEBB appeals unit will present the withdrawal request to the presiding officer or reviewing officer or officers.

(2) The request for withdrawal must be made in writing.

(3) After a withdrawal request is received, the presiding officer or reviewing officer or officers must enter and serve a written order dismissing the brief adjudicative proceeding or review of an initial order.

(4) If an appellant withdraws a request for a brief adjudicative proceeding or review of an initial order, the appellant may not reinstate the request for a brief adjudicative proceeding or review of an initial order unless time remains on their original appeal period.

(1) A final order issued by the reviewing officer or officers will be in writing and include a brief statement of the reasons for the decision.

(2) The final order must be served within 20 days of the date of the initial order or of the date the request for review of the initial order was received by the SEBB appeals unit, whichever is later.

(3) The final order will include a notice that reconsideration and judicial review may be available.

(4) A request for review of the initial order is deemed denied if the authority does not issue a final order within 20 days after the request for review of the initial order is filed.

(1) A request for reconsideration asks the reviewing officer or officers to reconsider the final order because the party believes the reviewing officer or officers made a mistake of law, mistake of fact, or clerical error.

(2) A request for reconsideration must state in writing why the party wants the final order to be reconsidered.

(3) Requests for reconsideration must be filed with the reviewing officer or officers who entered the final order.

(4) If a party files a request for reconsideration:

(a) The reviewing officer or officers must receive the request for reconsideration on or before the tenth business day after the service date of the final order;

(b) The party filing the request must send copies of the request to all other parties; and

(c) Within five business days of receiving a request for reconsideration, the reviewing officer or officers must serve to all parties a notice that provides the date the request for reconsideration was received.

(5) The other parties may respond to the request for reconsideration. The response must state in writing why the final order should stand. Responses are optional. If a party chooses not to respond, that party will not be prejudiced because of that choice.

(a) Responses to a request for reconsideration must be received by the reviewing officer or officers no later than seven business days after the service date of the reviewing officer or officers' notice as described in subsection (4)(c) of this section, or the response will not be considered.

(b) Service of responses to a request for reconsideration must be made to all parties.

(6) If a party needs more time to file a request for reconsideration or respond to a request for reconsideration, the reviewing officer or officers may extend the required time frame if the party makes a written request providing a good reason for the request within the required time frame.

(7) Unless the request for reconsideration is denied as untimely filed under subsection (4)(a) of this section, the same reviewing officer or officers who entered the final order, if reasonably available, will also consider the request as well as any responses received.

(8) The decision on the request for reconsideration must be in the form of a written order denying the request, granting the request in whole or in part and issuing a new written final order, or granting the request and setting the matter for further hearing.

(9) If the reviewing officer or officers do not send an order on the request for reconsideration within 20 calendar days of the date of the notice described in subsection (4)(c) of this section, the request is deemed denied.

(10) If any party files a request for reconsideration of the final order, the reconsideration process must be completed before any judicial review may be requested. However, the filing of a request for reconsideration is not required before requesting judicial review.

(11) An order denying a request for reconsideration is not subject to judicial review.

(12) No evidence may be offered in support of a motion for reconsideration, except newly discovered evidence that is material for the party moving for reconsideration and that the party could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced prior to the final order being issued.

(1) Judicial review is the process of appealing a final order to a court.

(2) The appellant may appeal a final order by filing a written petition for judicial review that meets the requirements of RCW 34.05.510 through 34.05.598. Neither the school employees benefits board (SEBB) program nor a SEBB organization may request judicial review.

(1) Judicial review is the process of appealing a final order to a court.

(2) The appellant may appeal a final order by filing a written petition for judicial review that meets the requirements of RCW 34.05.510 through 34.05.598. Neither the school employees benefits board (SEBB) program nor a SEBB organization or employer group may request judicial review.

Delivery pursuant to RCW 34.05.542(4) shall be deemed to have been made when a copy of the petition for judicial review has been received by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) appeals unit at Cherry Street Plaza, 626 8th Avenue S.E., Olympia, WA 98501 or received by mail at the SEBB appeals unit, P.O. Box 45504, Olympia, WA 98504-5504.

The designation of a presiding officer must be consistent with the requirements of RCW 34.05.485 and the presiding officer must not have personally participated in the decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or SEBB program.

(1) The presiding officer will decide the issue based on the information provided by the parties during the presiding officer's review of the appeal.

(2) A presiding officer is limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, rules, or applicable case law.

(3) A presiding officer may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable.

(4) In addition to the record, the presiding officer may employ the authority's expertise as a basis for the decision.

The designation of a presiding officer must be consistent with the requirements of RCW 34.05.485 and the presiding officer must not have personally participated in the decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization, employer group, or SEBB program.

(1) The presiding officer will decide the issue based on the information provided by the parties during the presiding officer's review of the appeal.

(2) A presiding officer is limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, rules, or applicable case law.

(3) A presiding officer may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable.

(4) In addition to the record, the presiding officer may employ the authority's expertise as a basis for the decision.

(1) The designation of a reviewing officer or officers must be consistent with the requirements of RCW 34.05.491 and the reviewing officer or officers must not have personally participated in the decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or SEBB program.

(2) The reviewing officer or officers must review the initial order and the record to determine if the initial order was correctly decided and make any inquiries necessary to ascertain whether the proceeding must be converted to a formal administrative hearing.

(3) The reviewing officer or officers will issue a final order that will either:

(a) Affirm the initial order in whole or in part; or

(b) Reverse the initial order in whole or in part; or

(c) Remand to the presiding officer in whole or in part.

(4) A reviewing officer or officers are limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, rules, or applicable case law.

(5) A reviewing officer or officers may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable.

(6) In addition to the record, the reviewing officer or officers may employ the authority's expertise as a basis for the decision.

(1) The designation of a reviewing officer or officers must be consistent with the requirements of RCW 34.05.491 and the reviewing officer or officers must not have personally participated in the decision made by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization, employer group, or SEBB program.

(2) The reviewing officer or officers must review the initial order and the record to determine if the initial order was correctly decided and make any inquiries necessary to ascertain whether the proceeding must be converted to a formal administrative hearing.

(3) The reviewing officer or officers will issue a final order that will either:

(a) Affirm the initial order in whole or in part; or

(b) Reverse the initial order in whole or in part; or

(c) Remand to the presiding officer in whole or in part.

(4) A reviewing officer or officers are limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, rules, or applicable case law.

(5) A reviewing officer or officers may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable.

(6) In addition to the record, the reviewing officer or officers may employ the authority's expertise as a basis for the decision.

(1) The presiding officer or the reviewing officer or officers, in their sole discretion, may convert a brief adjudicative proceeding to a formal administrative hearing at any time before the final order is issued on motion by:

(a) The appellant;

(b) The representative of the appellant;

(c) The authority; or

(d) The presiding officer or reviewing officer or officers.

(2) The presiding officer or reviewing officer or officers must convert the brief adjudicative proceeding to a formal administrative hearing when it is found that the use of the brief adjudicative proceeding violates any provision of law, when the protection of the public interest requires the authority to give notice and an opportunity to participate to persons other than the parties, or when the issues and interests involved in the controversy warrant the use of the procedures of RCW 34.05.413 through 34.05.476 that govern formal administrative hearings.

(3) When a brief adjudicative proceeding is converted to a formal administrative hearing, the director designates a hearing officer to conduct the formal administrative hearing upon notice to the appellant and the authority.

(4) When a brief adjudicative proceeding is converted to a formal administrative hearing, WAC 182-32-010 through 182-32-130 and WAC 182-32-3000 through 182-32-3200 apply to the formal administrative hearing.

(1) When a brief adjudicative proceeding is converted to a formal administrative hearing consistent with WAC 182-32-2160, the director designates a hearing officer to conduct the formal administrative hearing.

(2) Formal administrative hearings are conducted consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act, RCW 34.05.413 through 34-05-476.

(3) Part III describes the general rules and procedures that apply to school employees benefits board (SEBB) benefits formal administrative hearings.

(a) Part III supplements the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), chapter 34.05 RCW, and the model rules of procedure in chapter 10-08 WAC. The model rules of procedure adopted by the chief administrative law judge pursuant to RCW 34.05.250, as now or hereafter amended, are hereby adopted for use by the authority in school employees benefits board (SEBB) benefits formal administrative hearings. Other procedural rules adopted in chapters 182-30, 182-31, and 182-32 WAC are supplementary to the model rules of procedure.

(b) In the case of a conflict between the model rules of procedure and Part III, the procedural rules adopted in Part III must govern.

(c) If there is a conflict between Part III and specific SEBB program rules, the specific SEBB program rules prevail. SEBB program rules are found in chapters 182-30 and 182-31 WAC.

(d) Nothing in Part III is intended to affect the constitutional rights of any person or to limit or change additional requirements imposed by statute or other rule. Other laws or rules determine if a hearing right exists, including the APA and program rules or laws.

The record in a formal administrative hearing consists of the official documentation of the hearing process. The record includes, but is not limited to, recordings or transcripts, admitted exhibits, decisions, briefs, notices, orders, and other filed documents.

(1) All parties must provide the hearing officer and all other parties with their name, address, and telephone number.

(2) The appellant may act as their own representative or have another person represent them, except that employees of the health care authority (HCA) or HCA's authorized agents may not represent an appellant, unless approved by a hearing officer.

(3) If the appellant is represented by a person who is not an attorney admitted to practice in Washington state, the representative must provide the hearing officer and all other parties with the representative's name, address, and telephone number. In cases involving confidential information, the nonattorney representative must provide the HCA hearing representative with a signed, written consent permitting release to the nonattorney representative of health information protected by state or federal law.

(4) An attorney admitted to practice law in Washington state, who wishes to represent the appellant, must file a written notice of appearance containing the attorney's name, address, and telephone number with the hearing officer's office and serve all parties with the notice. In cases involving confidential information, the attorney representative must provide the HCA hearing representative with a signed, written consent permitting release to the attorney representative of the appellant's health information protected by state or federal law. If the appellant's attorney representative no longer represents the appellant, then the attorney must file a written notice of withdrawal of representation with the hearing officer's office and serve all parties with the notice.

(1) Assignment: A hearing officer will be assigned at least five business days before a hearing. A party may ask which hearing officer is assigned to a hearing by contacting the hearing officer's office listed on the notice of hearing. If requested by a party, the hearing officer's office must send the name of the assigned hearing officer to all parties, by electronic mail or in writing, at least five business days before the scheduled hearing date.

(2) Motion of prejudice: Any party requesting a different hearing officer may file a written motion of prejudice against the hearing officer assigned to the matter before the hearing officer rules on a discretionary issue in the case, admits evidence, or takes testimony.

(a) A motion of prejudice must include a declaration stating that a party does not believe the hearing officer can hear the case fairly. Service of copies of the motion must also be made to all parties listed on the notice of hearing.

(b) Any party's first motion of prejudice will be automatically granted. Any subsequent motion of prejudice made by a party may be granted or denied at the discretion of the hearing officer no later than seven days after receiving the motion.

(c) A party may make an oral motion of prejudice at the beginning of a hearing before the hearing officer rules on a discretionary issue in the matter, admits evidence, or takes testimony if:

(i) The hearing officer was not assigned at least five business days before the date of the hearing; or

(ii) The hearing officer was changed within five business days of the date of the hearing.

(3) Disqualification: A hearing officer may be disqualified from presiding over a hearing for bias, prejudice, conflict of interest, or ex parte contact with a party to the hearing.

(a) Any party may file a petition to disqualify a hearing officer as described in RCW 34.05.425. A petition to disqualify must be in writing and service promptly made to all parties and the hearing officer upon discovering facts of possible grounds for disqualification.

(b) The hearing officer whose disqualification is requested will determine whether to grant or deny the petition in a written order, stating facts and reasons for the determination. The hearing officer must serve the order no later than seven days after receiving the petition for disqualification.

(1) A hearing officer must hear and decide the issues based on the evidence and oral or written arguments presented during a formal administrative hearing and admitted into the record.

(2) A hearing officer has no inherent or common law powers, and is limited to those powers granted by the state constitution, statutes, or rules.

(3) A hearing officer may not decide that a rule is invalid or unenforceable. If the validity of a rule is raised during a formal administrative hearing, the hearing officer may allow argument only to preserve the record for judicial review.

(1) The hearing officer or their designee must serve a notice of a formal administrative hearing to all parties and their representatives at least twenty-one calendar days before the hearing date. The parties may agree to, but the hearing officer cannot impose, a shorter notice period.

(2) If a prehearing conference or dispositive motion hearing is scheduled, the hearing officer must serve a notice of the prehearing conference or dispositive motion hearing to the parties and their representatives at least seven business days before the date of the prehearing conference or dispositive motion hearing except:

(a) The hearing officer may change any scheduled formal administrative hearing into a prehearing conference or dispositive motion hearing and provide less than seven business days' notice of the prehearing conference or dispositive motion hearing; and

(b) The hearing officer may give less than seven business days' notice if the only purpose of the prehearing conference is to consider whether to grant a continuance.

(3) The hearing officer must reschedule a formal administrative hearing if necessary to comply with the notice requirements in Part III of this chapter.

(1) A hearing officer must be present at all hearings. Hearings may be held either in person or telephonically.

(a) A telephonic hearing is where all parties and the hearing officer are present by telephone.

(b) An in-person hearing is where the appellant appears face-to-face with the hearing officer. The other parties can choose to appear either in person or by telephone, but cannot be ordered to appear in person.

(2) Whether a hearing is held in person or telephonically, the parties have the right to see all documents, hear all testimony, and question all witnesses.

(3) If a hearing is originally scheduled to be held in-person, the appellant may ask the hearing officer to change the in-person hearing to a telephonic hearing. Once a telephonic hearing begins, the hearing officer may stop, reschedule, and change the telephonic hearing to an in-person hearing if any party makes such a request.

(1) Any party may request the hearing officer to reschedule a formal administrative hearing if a rule requires notice of a hearing and the amount of notice required was not provided.

(a) The hearing officer must reschedule the formal administrative hearing under circumstances identified in this chapter if requested by any party.

(b) The parties may agree to shorten the amount of notice required by any rule.

(2) Any party may request a continuance of a formal administrative hearing either orally or in writing.

(a) In each formal administrative hearing, the hearing officer must grant each party's first request for a continuance. The continuance may be up to thirty calendar days.

(b) The hearing officer may grant each party up to one additional continuance of up to thirty calendar days because of extraordinary circumstances.

(c) After granting a continuance, the hearing officer or their designee must serve an order of continuance on the parties no later than fourteen days before the new formal administrative hearing date. All orders of continuance must provide a new deadline for filing documents with the hearing officer. The new filing deadline can be no less than ten calendar days prior to the new formal administrative hearing date. If the continuance is granted pursuant to (b) of this subsection, then the order of continuance must also include findings of fact that state with specificity the extraordinary circumstances for which the hearing officer granted the continuance.

(3) Regardless of whether a party has been granted a continuance as described in subsection (2)(b) of this section, the hearing officer must grant a continuance if a new material issue is raised during the formal administrative hearing and a party requests a continuance.

(1) A prehearing conference is a formal proceeding conducted on the record by a hearing officer to prepare for a formal administrative hearing.

(a) The hearing officer must record a prehearing conference using audio recording equipment.

(b) The hearing officer may conduct a prehearing conference in person, by telephone conference call, or in any other manner acceptable to the parties.

(2) Any party can request a prehearing conference. The hearing officer must grant each party's first request for a prehearing conference if it is filed with the hearing officer at least seven business days before the next scheduled hearing date. The hearing officer may grant requests for additional prehearing conferences.

(3) The appellant must attend or participate in any scheduled prehearing conference. If the appellant does not attend or participate in a scheduled prehearing conference, the hearing officer will enter an order of default dismissing the matter.

(4) During a prehearing conference the parties and the hearing officer may:

(a) Identify the issue or issues to be decided;

(b) Agree to the date, time, and place of any requested or necessary hearing or hearings;

(c) Identify accommodation and safety issues; or

(d) Establish a schedule for:

(i) The exchange and filing of briefs;

(ii) Providing a list of proposed witnesses;

(iii) Providing exhibit lists; and

(iv) Providing proposed exhibits before the hearing.

(5) After the prehearing conference ends, the hearing officer must enter a written order that recites the action taken at the prehearing conference, a case schedule outlining hearing dates and deadlines for exchanging witness lists and exhibits, and any other agreements reached by the parties.

(6) The hearing officer must serve the prehearing order to the parties at least fourteen calendar days before the next scheduled hearing.

(7) A party may object to the prehearing order by filing an objection with the hearing officer in writing no later than ten days after the service date of the order. The hearing officer must serve a written ruling on the objection.

(8) If no objection is made to the prehearing order, the order determines how the case will be conducted by the hearing officer, including whether a hearing will be in person or held by telephone conference, unless the hearing officer enters an amended prehearing conference order.

(1) A dispositive motion could dispose of one or all the issues in a formal administrative hearing, such as a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment.

(2) To request a dispositive motion hearing a party must file a written dispositive motion with the hearing officer and serve a copy of the motion to all other parties. The hearing officer may also set a dispositive motion hearing, and request briefing from the parties, to address any possible dispositive issues the hearing officer believes must be addressed before the hearing.

(3) The deadline to file a timely dispositive motion must be ten calendar days before the scheduled hearing.

(4) Upon receiving a dispositive motion, a hearing officer:

(a) Must convert the scheduled hearing to a dispositive motion hearing when:

(i) The dispositive motion is timely filed with the hearing officer at least ten calendar days before the date of the hearing; and

(ii) The party filing the dispositive motion has not previously filed a dispositive motion.

(b) May schedule a dispositive motion hearing in all instances other than described in (a) of this subsection.

(5) The hearing officer may conduct the dispositive motion hearing in person or by telephone conference. For dispositive motion hearings scheduled to be held in person, the health care authority (HCA) hearing representative may choose to attend and participate in person or by telephone conference call.

(6) The party requesting the dispositive motion hearing must attend and participate in the dispositive motion hearing in person or by telephone. If the party requesting the motion hearing does not attend and participate in the dispositive motion hearing, the hearing officer will enter an order dismissing the dispositive motion.

(7) During a dispositive motion hearing, the hearing officer can only consider the filed dispositive motions, any response to the motions, evidence submitted to support or oppose the motions, and argument on the motions. Prior to rescheduling any necessary hearings, the hearing officer must serve a written order on the dispositive motions.

(8) The hearing officer must serve the written order on the dispositive motions to all parties no later than eighteen calendar days after the dispositive motion hearing is held. Orders on dispositive motions are subject to motions for reconsideration or petitions for judicial review as described in WAC 182-32-3180 and 182-32-3200.

(1) Hearing officers, the health care authority (HCA) hearing representative, and attorneys for the parties may prepare subpoenas as described in Washington state civil rule 45, unless otherwise prohibited by law. Any party may request the hearing officer prepare a subpoena on their behalf.

(2) The hearing officer may schedule a prehearing conference to decide whether to issue a subpoena.

(3) If a party requests the hearing officer prepare a subpoena on its behalf, the party is responsible for:

(a) Service of the subpoena; and

(b) Any costs associated with:

(i) Compliance with the subpoena; and

(ii) Witness fees as described in RCW 34.05.446(7).

(4) Service of a subpoena must be made by a person who is at least eighteen years old and not a party to the hearing. Service of the subpoena is complete when the person serving the subpoena:

(a) Gives the person or entity named in the subpoena a copy of the subpoena; or

(b) Leaves a copy of the subpoena with a person over the age of eighteen at the residence or place of business of the person or entity named in the subpoena.

(5) To prove service of a subpoena on a witness, the person serving the subpoena must file with the hearing officer's office a signed, written, and dated statement that includes:

(a) The name of the person to whom service of the subpoena occurred;

(b) The date of the service of the subpoena occurred;

(c) The address where the service of the subpoena occurred; and

(d) The name, age, and address of the person who provided service of the subpoena.

(6) A person or entity subject to or affected by the subpoena may request the hearing officer quash (set aside) or change a subpoena request at any time before the deadline given in the subpoena.

(7) A hearing officer may quash (set aside) or change a subpoena if it is unreasonable.

(1) An order of dismissal is an order from the hearing officer ending the matter. The order is entered because the party who made the appeal withdrew from the proceeding, the appellant is no longer aggrieved, the hearing officer granted a dispositive motion dismissing the matter, or the hearing officer entered an order of default because the party who made the appeal failed to attend or refused to participate in a prehearing conference or the formal administrative hearing.

(2) The order of dismissal becomes a final order if no party files a request to vacate the order as described in subsections (3) through (7) of this section.

(3) If the hearing officer enters and serves an order dismissing the formal administrative hearing, the appellant may file a written request to vacate (set aside) the order of dismissal. Upon receipt of a request to vacate an order of dismissal, the hearing officer must schedule and serve notice of a prehearing conference as described in WAC 182-32-3080. At the prehearing conference, the party asking that the order of dismissal be vacated has the burden to show good cause according to subsection (8) of this section for an order of dismissal to be vacated and the matter to be reinstated.

(4) The request to vacate an order of dismissal must be filed with the hearing officer and the other parties. The party requesting that an order of dismissal be vacated should specify in the request with good cause why the order of dismissal should be vacated.

(5) The request to vacate an order of dismissal must be filed with the hearing officer no later than twenty-one calendar days after the date the order of dismissal was entered. If no request is received within that deadline, the dismissal order becomes the health care authority's final decision without further action.

(6) If the hearing officer finds good cause, as described in subsection (8) of this section, for the order of dismissal to be vacated, the hearing officer must enter and serve a written order to the parties setting forth the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the reinstatement of the matter.

(7) If the order of dismissal is vacated, the hearing officer will conduct a formal administrative hearing at which the parties may present argument and evidence about issues raised in the original appeal. The formal administrative hearing may occur immediately following the prehearing conference on the request to vacate only if agreed to by the parties and the hearing officer, otherwise a formal administrative hearing date must be scheduled by the hearing officer.

(8) Good cause is a substantial reason or legal justification for failing to appear, act, or respond to an action using the provisions of superior court civil rule 60 as a guideline. This good cause exception does not apply to any other chapter in Title 182 WAC except WAC 182-16-3140(8).

(1) The appellant may withdraw a formal administrative hearing for any reason, and at any time, by contacting the health care authority (HCA) hearing representative who will coordinate the withdrawal with the hearing officer.

(2) The request for withdrawal must generally be made in writing. An oral withdrawal by the appellant is permitted during a formal administrative hearing when both the hearing officer and HCA hearing representative are present.

(3) After a withdrawal request is received, the hearing officer must cancel any scheduled hearings and enter and serve a written order dismissing the case.

(1) Initial order: When the office of administrative hearings is holding a formal administrative hearing on behalf of the authority, the hearing officer must render a written initial order that addresses the issue or issues raised by the appellant in their appeal. The hearing officer must serve a copy of the initial order on all parties and the initial order must contain information on how the appellant may request review of the initial order.

(2) Final order: The final order will only be issued by the authority. After the reviewing officer or officers receives a request for review, the reviewing officer or officers has 20 calendar days to enter and serve a final order to all parties unless the reviewing officer serves notice allowing more time.

(3) In the written final order, the hearing officer must:

(a) Identify the order as a final order of the school employees benefits board (SEBB) program;

(b) List the name and docket number of the case and the names of all parties and representatives;

(c) Enter findings of fact used to resolve the dispute based on the evidence admitted in the record;

(d) Explain why evidence is, or is not, credible when describing the weight given to evidence related to disputed facts;

(e) State the law that applies to the dispute;

(f) Apply the law to the facts of the case in the conclusions of law;

(g) Discuss the reasons for the decision based on the facts and the law;

(h) State the result and remedy ordered; and

(i) Include any other information required by law or program rules.

(1) Both the appellant and the authority may request review of an initial order. An appellant who has received an initial order upholding a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization decision, a SEBB program decision, or a decision made by a SEBB program contracted vendor, may request review of the initial order by filing a written request or making an oral request with the SEBB appeals unit within 20 days after service of the initial order. The written or oral request for review of the initial order must be made by using the contact information included in the initial order. If such review is requested, the hearing officer or their designee from the authority, shall issue a final order in accordance with WAC 182-32-3030. If the appellant fails to request review of the initial order within 20 days, the initial order becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(2) Upon timely request by the appellant, a review of an initial order will be performed by one or more reviewing officers designated by the director of the authority.

(3) If the appellant has not requested review of the initial order, the authority may review an initial order issued by the office of administrative hearings on its own, and without notice to the parties, but it may not take action on review less favorable to any party than the initial order without giving that party notice and an opportunity to explain that party's view of the matter.

(1) Both the appellant and the authority may request review of an initial order. An appellant who has received an initial order upholding a school employees benefits board (SEBB) organization or employer group decision, a SEBB program decision, or a decision made by a SEBB program contracted vendor, may request review of the initial order by filing a written request or making an oral request with the SEBB appeals unit within 20 days after service of the initial order. The written or oral request for review of the initial order must be made by using the contact information included in the initial order. If such review is requested, the hearing officer or their designee from the authority, shall issue a final order in accordance with WAC 182-32-3030. If the appellant fails to request review of the initial order within 20 days, the initial order becomes the authority's final order without further action.

(2) Upon timely request by the appellant, a review of an initial order will be performed by one or more reviewing officers designated by the director of the authority.

(3) If the appellant has not requested review of the initial order, the authority may review an initial order issued by the office of administrative hearings on its own, and without notice to the parties, but it may not take action on review less favorable to any party than the initial order without giving that party notice and an opportunity to explain that party's view of the matter.

(1) A request for reconsideration asks the hearing officer to reconsider the final order because the party believes the hearing officer made a mistake of law, mistake of fact, or clerical error.

(2) A request for reconsideration must state in writing why the party wants the final order to be reconsidered.

(3) Requests for reconsideration must be filed with the hearing officer who entered the final order.

(4) If a party files a request for reconsideration:

(a) The hearing officer must receive the request for reconsideration on or before the tenth business day after the service date of the final order;

(b) The party filing the request must serve copies of the request on all other parties on the same day the request is served on the hearing officer; and

(c) Within five business days of receiving a request for reconsideration, the hearing officer must serve to all parties a notice that provides the date the request for reconsideration was received.

(5) The other parties may respond to the request for reconsideration. The response must state in writing why the final order should stand. Responses are optional. If a party chooses not to respond, that party will not be prejudiced because of that choice.

(a) Responses to a request for reconsideration must be received by the hearing officer no later than seven business days after the service date of the hearing officer's notice as described in subsection (4)(c) of this section, or the response will not be considered.

(b) Service of responses to a request for reconsideration must be made to all parties.

(6) If a party needs more time to file a request for reconsideration or respond to a request for reconsideration, the hearing officer may extend the required time frame if the party makes a written request providing a good reason for the request within the required time frame.

(7) No evidence may be offered in support of a motion for reconsideration, except newly discovered evidence that is material for the party moving for reconsideration and that the party could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced prior to the final order being issued.

(1) Unless the request for reconsideration is denied as untimely filed under WAC 182-32-3180, the same hearing officer who entered the final order, if reasonably available, will also decide the request as well as any responses received.

(2) The decision on the request for reconsideration must be in the form of a written order denying or granting the request in whole or in part and if the request is granted issuing a new written final order.

(3) If the hearing officer does not send an order on the request for reconsideration within twenty calendar days of the date of the notice described in WAC 182-32-3180 (4)(c), the request is deemed denied.

(4) If any party files a request for reconsideration of the final order, the reconsideration process must be completed before any judicial review may be requested. However, the filing of a request for reconsideration is not required before requesting judicial review.

(5) An order denying a request for reconsideration is not subject to judicial review.

(1) Judicial review is the process of appealing a final order to a court.

(2) The appellant may appeal a final order by filing a written petition for judicial review that meets the requirements of RCW 34.05.510 through 34.05.598. The school employees benefits board (SEBB) program may not request judicial review.

(3) The appellant should consult RCW 34.05.510 through 34.05.598 for further details and requirements of the judicial review process.

Delivery pursuant to RCW 34.05.542(4) shall be deemed to have been made when a copy of the petition for judicial review has been received by the school employees benefits board (SEBB) appeals unit at Cherry Street Plaza, 626 8th Avenue S.E., Olympia, WA 98501 or received by mail at the SEBB appeals unit, P.O. Box 45504, Olympia, WA 98504-5504.