Passed by the Senate April 17, 2007 YEAS 48   ________________________________________ President of the Senate Passed by the House April 4, 2007 YEAS 94   ________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives | I, Thomas Hoemann, Secretary of the Senate of the State of Washington, do hereby certify that the attached is SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6100 as passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives on the dates hereon set forth. ________________________________________ Secretary | |
Approved ________________________________________ Governor of the State of Washington | Secretary of State State of Washington |
State of Washington | 60th Legislature | 2007 Regular Session |
READ FIRST TIME 02/28/07.
AN ACT Relating to charitable donations; amending RCW 10.01.160; adding a new section to chapter 10.01 RCW; and adding a new section to chapter 46.63 RCW.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 A new section is added to chapter 10.01 RCW
to read as follows:
A city attorney, county prosecutor, or other prosecuting authority
may not dismiss, amend, or agree not to file a criminal charge in
exchange for a contribution, donation, or payment to any person,
corporation, or organization. This does not prohibit:
(1) Contribution, donation, or payment to any specific fund
authorized by state statute;
(2) The collection of costs associated with actual supervision,
treatment, or collection of restitution under agreements to defer or
divert; or
(3) Dismissal following payment that is authorized by any other
statute.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 A new section is added to chapter 46.63 RCW
to read as follows:
A city attorney, county prosecutor, or other prosecuting authority
may not dismiss, amend, or agree not to file an infraction in exchange
for a contribution, donation, or payment to any person, corporation, or
organization. This does not prohibit:
(1) Contribution, donation, or payment to any specific fund
authorized by state statute;
(2) The collection of costs associated with actual supervision,
treatment, or collection of restitution under agreements to defer or
divert; or
(3) Dismissal following payment that is authorized by any other
statute.
Sec. 3 RCW 10.01.160 and 2005 c 263 s 2 are each amended to read
as follows:
(1) The court may require a defendant to pay costs. Costs may be
imposed only upon a convicted defendant, except for costs imposed upon
a defendant's entry into a deferred prosecution program, costs imposed
upon a defendant for pretrial supervision, or costs imposed upon a
defendant for preparing and serving a warrant for failure to appear.
(2) Costs shall be limited to expenses specially incurred by the
state in prosecuting the defendant or in administering the deferred
prosecution program under chapter 10.05 RCW or pretrial supervision.
They cannot include expenses inherent in providing a constitutionally
guaranteed jury trial or expenditures in connection with the
maintenance and operation of government agencies that must be made by
the public irrespective of specific violations of law. Expenses
incurred for serving of warrants for failure to appear and jury fees
under RCW 10.46.190 may be included in costs the court may require a
defendant to pay. Costs for administering a deferred prosecution or
pretrial supervision may not exceed one hundred fifty dollars. Costs
for preparing and serving a warrant for failure to appear may not
exceed one hundred dollars. Costs of incarceration imposed on a
defendant convicted of a misdemeanor or a gross misdemeanor may not
exceed the actual cost of incarceration. In no case may the court
require the offender to pay more than one hundred dollars per day for
the cost of incarceration. Payment of other court-ordered financial
obligations, including all legal financial obligations and costs of
supervision take precedence over the payment of the cost of
incarceration ordered by the court. All funds received from defendants
for the cost of incarceration in the county or city jail must be
remitted for criminal justice purposes to the county or city that is
responsible for the defendant's jail costs. Costs imposed constitute
a judgment against a defendant and survive a dismissal of the
underlying action against the defendant. However, if the defendant is
acquitted on the underlying action, the costs for preparing and serving
a warrant for failure to appear do not survive the acquittal, and the
judgment that such costs would otherwise constitute shall be vacated.
(3) The court shall not ((sentence)) order a defendant to pay costs
unless the defendant is or will be able to pay them. In determining
the amount and method of payment of costs, the court shall take account
of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the
burden that payment of costs will impose.
(4) A defendant who has been ((sentenced)) ordered to pay costs and
who is not in contumacious default in the payment thereof may at any
time petition the sentencing court for remission of the payment of
costs or of any unpaid portion thereof. If it appears to the
satisfaction of the court that payment of the amount due will impose
manifest hardship on the defendant or the defendant's immediate family,
the court may remit all or part of the amount due in costs, or modify
the method of payment under RCW 10.01.170.